The Covent Garden Theatre, or Pasquin Turn'd Drawcansir — A Closer Reading

(0 User reviews)   983
Macklin, Charles, 1697?-1797 Project Gutenberg 2009 Not confirmed
English drama Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 17,215
Reading time 75 min
Text sections 3

The Covent Garden Theatre, or Pasquin Turn'd Drawcansir — A Closer Reading can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 17,215 words, 1 hr 15 min estimated reading time, and 3 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 18.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “English drama,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

An editorial note on Charles Macklin's 1752 manuscript play, focusing on how its opening, middle, and later excerpts guide a first reading through satirical courtroom framing, character introductions, and textual ambiguities.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.5/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

E-text prepared by Louise Hope, Joseph Cooper, Alex Buie, The Type-In Addicts, and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net)

Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this file which includes illustrative images of portions of the original text. See 30584-h.htm or 30584-h.zip: (https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/30584/pg30584-images.html) or (https://www.gutenberg.org/files/30584/30584-h.zip)

The primary text was handwritten, probably by a professional copyist. All line-endings were regularized by added dashes of variable length; some "real" dashes are therefore conjectural. Instead of typographic variants such as italics or boldface, some words are distinguished by _underlining_ or #smaller writing#. Abbreviations such as "Mr." were written with superscripts as M^r.; they have been simplified for readability.

Unless otherwise noted, all spelling, punctuation and capitalization--including I/J variation and comma/period errors--are as in the original. Errors and uncertainties are listed at the end of the e-text.

The Augustan Reprint Society

_THE COVENT GARDEN_ _THEATRE,_

OR _Pasquin Turn'd Drawcansir_

_INTRODUCTION_ by JEAN B. KERN

Publication Number 116 WILLIAM ANDREWS CLARK MEMORIAL LIBRARY University of California, Los Angeles 1965

Earl R. Miner, _University of California, Los Angeles_ Maximillian E. Novak, _University of California, Los Angeles_ Lawrence Clark Powell, _Wm. Andrews Clark Memorial Library_

Richard C. Boys, _University of Michigan_ John Butt, _University of Edinburgh_ James L. Clifford, _Columbia University_ Ralph Cohen, _University of California, Los Angeles_ Vinton A. Dearing, _University of California, Los Angeles_ Arthur Friedman, _University of Chicago_ Louis A. Landa, _Princeton University_ Samuel H. Monk, _University of Minnesota_ Everett T. Moore, _University of California, Los Angeles_ James Sutherland, _University College, London_ H. T. Swedenberg, Jr., _University of California, Los Angeles_

CORRESPONDING SECRETARY

Edna C. Davis, _Clark Memorial Library_

Although of considerable interest in itself, this hitherto unpublished manuscript play is reprinted in facsimile in response to requests by members of the Society for a manuscript facsimile of use in graduate seminars.

The Larpent collection of the Huntington Library contains the manuscript copy of Charles Macklin's COVENT GARDEN THEATRE, OR PASQUIN TURN'D DRAWCANSIR in two acts (Larpent 96) which is here reproduced in facsimile.[1] It is an interesting example of that mid-eighteenth-century phenomenon, the afterpiece, from a period when not only Shakespearean stock productions but new plays as well were accompanied by such farcical appendages.[2] This particular afterpiece is worth reproducing not only for its catalogue of the social foibles of the age, but as an illustration of satirical writing for the stage at a time when dramatic taste often wavered toward the sentimental. It appears that it has not been previously printed.

As an actor Charles Macklin is remembered for his Scottish dress in the role of Macbeth, for his realistic portrayal of Shylock, for his quarrel with Garrick in 1743, and for his private lectures on acting at the Piazza in Covent Garden. He is less well known than he deserves as a dramatist although there has been a recent revival of interest in his plays stimulated by a biography by William W. Appleton, _Charles Macklin: An Actor's Life_ (Harvard University Press, 1960) and evidenced in "A Critical Study of the Extant Plays of Charles Macklin" by Robert R. Findlay (PhD. Thesis at the State University of Iowa, 1963). Appleton mentions that Macklin lost books and manuscripts in a shipwreck in 1771 (p. 150) and that play manuscripts may also have disappeared in the sale of his books and papers at the end of his long life at the turn of the eighteenth century. It is possible that more of Macklin's work may come to light, like _The Fortune Hunters_ which appeared in the National Library in Dublin. Until a complete critical edition of Macklin's plays appears, making possible better assessment of his merit, such farces as THE COVENT GARDEN THEATRE will have to stand as an example of one genre of eighteenth-century theatrical productions.

The manuscript of The Covent Garden Theatre, or Pasquin Turn'd Drawcansir begins not with a scene but with a paratextual apparatus that immediately signals its hybrid nature: part play, part document. The title page presents Pasquin—a name borrowed from the Roman pasquinades—as transformed into Drawcansir, a character from Buckingham's The Rehearsal. This double allusion primes readers for satire aimed at both theatrical fashion and moral censorship. The opening pages, including the Augustan Reprint Society's introduction, establish that the text is a facsimile of a handwritten copy, likely by a professional scribe, with line-endings regularized by added dashes. Readers encounter these editorial notes before any dialogue, a framing that foregrounds the play's status as a historical artifact rather than a polished performance text.

A Courtroom of Fashion and Vice

The first excerpt plunges the reader into a mock trial before Pasquin, styled as "Censor of Great Britain." The dialogue crackles with double entendres and social critique. Lady Lucy Loveit, arrested en route to a masquerade, is accused of indecency for her "very short Pet: en l'air" and bare neck. Sir Roger's bawdy wager—"I'll hold a Hogshead of Claret to a Gill, she pleases more than the Ostrich"—anchors the satire in contemporary stage rivalries, likely referencing the real Ostrich act at Covent Garden. Pasquin's role as judge is complicated by his own theatrical past: he performed at the Italian Theatre in Paris. This layered identity invites readers to question whether he is a genuine censor or a showman exploiting scandal for profit.

Character as Caricature

Macklin populates his courtroom with a gallery of types, each announced by name and exaggerated speech. Sir Roger Eternal, Sir Rogert Marfario, and Miss Giggle are less characters than walking vices. Lady Lucy's entrance—masked, dressed for the masquerade, and immediately recognized by Hydra—blurs the line between public performance and private identity. Her line "I am dress'd for the Masquerade" underscores the play's central conceit: all the world is a stage, and the courtroom is merely another scene. The rapid-fire exchanges, with characters interrupting and overlapping, mimic the chaos of a real theatre pit. Readers should note how Macklin uses names as shorthand: Hydra suggests a many-headed monster of gossip, while Marfario echoes the commedia dell'arte figure who delivers false news.

The Manuscript's Material Clues

The text itself bears witness to its own production. The transcriber's notes alert readers to missing pages (60–61), uncertain readings, and corrections by the original writer or the Examiner of Plays. These marks of censorship and revision are not mere footnotes; they are part of the play's meaning. The fact that the manuscript was submitted to the Examiner—and that some passages were altered or struck—suggests that Macklin's satire trod close to the line of permissible critique. Readers encountering the text in facsimile must navigate these material layers: the handwritten original, the editorial interventions, and the modern transcription. The play's content—a satire on theatrical regulation—thus becomes mirrored in its own history of regulation.

Reading Between the Dashes

One of the most distinctive features of this edition is the regularization of line-endings by added dashes. The editors note that "some 'real' dashes are therefore conjectural." This ambiguity forces readers to attend to punctuation as a site of interpretation. When Lady Lucy exclaims "O you fulsome Creature [she unmasks] from what Antiquated Romance did you Steal that vile Compliment," the dash after "Creature" may be original or editorial. Such details matter because they affect rhythm and tone. The play's humor depends on timing—the rapid volleys of repartee, the pauses for laughter. A conjectural dash can alter a punchline. First-time readers are advised to read aloud, testing the dashes as potential breaths or beats, and to consult the page images when in doubt.

This edition rewards a slow, attentive reading that moves between the dialogue and its material frame. The play's satire is pointed but not obscure; its targets—fashionable vice, theatrical hypocrisy, and censorship—remain legible. What may disorient is the manuscript's unfinished quality: missing pages, uncertain readings, and the sense of a work caught between performance and print. Treat these gaps not as defects but as invitations to imagine the play in its original context, where every dash and correction tells a story of eighteenth-century stage politics.

Reading the editorial note on Macklin’s manuscript, I was struck by how carefully its framing shaped my first impressions—that gentle guidance through satire and ambiguity felt familiar. It reminded me of another collection’s careful context, where character introductions and textual notes similarly softened the edges of uncertainty. I found myself thinking of Plays: Lady Frederick, The Explorer, A Man of Honour — Text and Context late that evening, a quiet echo of the same patient hand.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What did you think of this book?

Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Which reading stage best describes you?

2

How did the book work for you overall?

3

Would you recommend this book to another reader?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks