Hedda Gabler — Reading Notes

(0 User reviews)   65
Ibsen, Henrik, 1828-1906, Archer, William, 1856-1924 [Translator], Gosse, Edmund, 1849-1928 [Translator] Project Gutenberg 2003 Not confirmed
Man-woman relationships -- Drama; Women -- Social conditions -- Drama; Identity (Psychology) -- Drama; Norwegian drama -- Translations into English Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 33,781
Reading time 147 min
Text sections 7

This digital edition of Hedda Gabler — Reading Notes is described by source-level measurements including 33,781 words, 2 hr 27 min estimated reading time, and 7 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 10.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Man-woman relationships -- Drama,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Ibsen's 1890 play follows the newly married Hedda Tesman, née Gabler, as she navigates a constricted domestic life. The excerpts reveal her sharp, manipulative speech and a tense reunion with former rival Eilert Løvborg, whose manuscript becomes a flashpoint. The title emphasizes her identity as her father's daughter, not her husband's wife.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.6/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Ibsen had no doubt heard how the wife of a well-known Norwegian composer, in a fit of raging jealousy excited by her husband's prolonged absence from home, burnt the manuscript of a symphony which he had just finished. The circumstances under which Hedda burns Lovborg's manuscript are, of course, entirely different and infinitely more dramatic; but here we have merely another instance of the dramatisation or "poetisation" of the raw material of life. Again, a still more painful incident probably came to his knowledge about the same time. A beautiful and very intellectual woman was married to a well-known man who had been addicted to drink, but had entirely conquered the vice. One day a mad whim seized her to put his self-mastery and her power over him to the test. As it happened to be his birthday, she rolled into his study a small keg of brandy, and then withdrew. She returned some time after wards to find that he had broached the keg, and lay insensible on the floor. In this anecdote we cannot but recognise the germ, not only of Hedda's temptation of Lovborg, but of a large part of her character.

"Thus," says Dr. Brandes, "out of small and scattered traits of reality Ibsen fashioned his close-knit and profoundly thought-out works of art."

For the character of Eilert Lovborg, again, Ibsen seem unquestionably to have borrowed several traits from a definite original. A young Danish man of letters, whom Dr. Brandes calls Holm, was an enthusiastic admirer of Ibsen, and came to be on very friendly terms with him. One day Ibsen was astonished to receive, in Munich, a parcel addressed from Berlin by this young man, containing, without a word of explanation, a packet of his (Ibsen's) letters, and a photograph which he had presented to Holm. Ibsen brooded and brooded over the incident, and at last came to the conclusion that the young man had intended to return her letters and photograph to a young lady to whom he was known to be attached, and had in a fit of aberration mixed up the two objects of his worship. Some time after, Holm appeared at Ibsen's rooms. He talked quite rationally, but professed to have no knowledge whatever of the letter-incident, though he admitted the truth of Ibsen's conjecture that the "belle dame sans merci" had demanded the return of her letters and portrait. Ibsen was determined to get at the root of the mystery; and a little inquiry into his young friend's habits revealed the fact that he broke his fast on a bottle of port wine, consumed a bottle of Rhine wine at lunch, of Burgundy at dinner, and finished off the evening with one or two more bottles of port. Then he heard, too, how, in the course of a night's carouse, Holm had lost the manuscript of a book; and in these traits he saw the outline of the figure of Eilert Lovborg.

Some time elapsed, and again Ibsen received a postal packet from Holm. This one contained his will, in which Ibsen figured as his residuary legatee. But many other legatees were mentioned in the instrument--all of them ladies, such as Fraulein Alma Rothbart, of Bremen, and Fraulein Elise Kraushaar, of Berlin. The bequests to these meritorious spinsters were so generous that their sum considerably exceeded the amount of the testator's property. Ibsen gently but firmly declined the proffered inheritance; but Holm's will no doubt suggested to him the figure of that red-haired "Mademoiselle Diana," who is heard of but not seen in _Hedda Gabler_, and enabled him to add some further traits to the portraiture of Lovborg. When the play appeared, Holm recognised himself with glee in the character of the bibulous man of letters, and thereafter adopted "Eilert Lovborg" as his pseudonym. I do not, therefore, see why Dr. Brandes should suppress his real name; but I willingly imitate him in erring on the side of discretion. The poor fellow died several years ago.

From the opening lines of Act First, Ibsen establishes a world of constrained domesticity through stage directions and dialogue. The Tesman home is described as a “handsome, tastefully furnished drawing room,” but the characters’ exchanges immediately undercut this comfort. Hedda’s first words to her husband, “Tesman, dear—you can’t think how I’ve been longing for you!” carry a tone that readers quickly learn to distrust. The play’s title, as Ibsen explained in a letter quoted in the introduction, signals that Hedda is to be regarded “rather as her father’s daughter than as her husband’s wife.” This editorial note traces how the opening, middle, and later excerpts guide a first reading, focusing on the interplay of voice, power, and withheld information.

A Voice of Restraint and Defiance

Hedda’s dialogue in the opening act is marked by a pattern of polite contradiction. When Tesman praises the villa, she replies, “Yes—I think it’s quite charming, in a way.” The qualifier “in a way” signals her dissatisfaction. Later, when her old schoolmate Thea Elvsted visits, Hedda’s questions are pointed: “And you have really had the courage to leave your husband?” Thea’s nervous answers reveal a history Hedda already knows. Ibsen uses these exchanges to show Hedda’s control over conversation—she steers topics, withholds sympathy, and tests boundaries. The stage directions note her “cold, clear” voice, a detail that recurs. Readers should attend to what Hedda does not say: her silences and abrupt changes of subject often carry more weight than her words.

The Manuscript as a Contested Object

In the middle of Act Second, Eilert Løvborg arrives with a manuscript he calls “the real book—the book I have put my true self into.” This object becomes a focal point of tension. Løvborg describes it as a continuation of his earlier work, now dealing with “the future” and “the civilising forces of the future.” Tesman’s reaction—puzzled, slightly envious—contrasts with Hedda’s silent observation: she drums on the window pane and mutters “H’m—. I daresay not.” The manuscript is not merely a prop; it represents Løvborg’s reclaimed ambition and his rivalry with Tesman. When Brack proposes Løvborg read it at his party, Hedda intervenes, insisting Løvborg stay for supper with her and Thea. Her manipulation redirects the evening’s plan. The manuscript’s fate, though not fully shown in the excerpts, is clearly tied to the characters’ competing desires.

Social Rituals and Unspoken Rules

Ibsen’s dialogue is dense with social maneuvering. In the excerpt, Brack invites Løvborg to his gathering, promising “a lively time, as Mrs. Hed—as Mrs. Tesman says.” The slip from “Hed” to “Tesman” underscores Hedda’s new marital identity. Løvborg declines curtly: “No, I can’t—thank you very much.” But when Hedda mentions Thea Elvsted will be present, he changes his mind. This moment reveals the network of obligations and attractions that govern the characters. Tesman, meanwhile, worries about Løvborg’s lecture series competing with his own academic appointment. The conversation is layered with subtext: every invitation carries a threat, every refusal a slight. Readers should note how often characters speak past each other, answering questions with evasions or counter-questions.

The Weight of the Past in the Present

The excerpts repeatedly hint at histories that shape the action. Hedda and Løvborg have a shared past—she calls him by his first name, and he looks at her “with a searching glance.” Thea’s arrival reopens old wounds. Ibsen withholds full explanations, forcing readers to infer from gestures and half-sentences. When Løvborg says he saw Thea “for a moment this morning,” Hedda’s response—“Did you? Well, she is coming this evening”—is deliberately casual, yet the stage direction notes she speaks “lightly.” The introduction by William Archer includes Ibsen’s letter stating his intention was “to depict human beings, human emotions, and human destinies, upon a groundwork of certain of the social conditions and principles of the present day.” The excerpts bear this out: the characters are trapped not only by their own choices but by the expectations of their society.

A first-time reader of Hedda Gabler will benefit from paying close attention to the stage directions, which often contradict what characters say. Ibsen’s dialogue is a surface beneath which currents of resentment, desire, and fear run deep. The excerpts provided here offer a concentrated sample of his method: every line advances both plot and character, and no remark is incidental. As you read the full play, note how the patterns established in these early scenes—Hedda’s coldness, Tesman’s obliviousness, Løvborg’s volatility—intensify and collide.

That afternoon, rain blurred the window as Hedda’s sharp edges—her father’s pistol, her trapped fury—lingered long after I closed the script. I found myself reaching for something quieter, almost without deciding. Duty, and Other Irish Comedies — Inside the Classic offered that same domestic tension, softened by wry, bittersweet laughs, and it felt like exhaling. Two worlds, same cage, different light.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How did this book work for you?

Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

Was reading this book enjoyable?

3

Would you pass this book on to a friend?

4

How much effort did this book require?

Related eBooks