Three plays by Frederic Hebbel — Reading Notes

(0 User reviews)   921
Hebbel, Friedrich, 1813-1863, Rhys, Ernest, 1859-1946 [Editor], Allen, Leslie Holdsworth, 1879-1964 [Translator], Fairley, Barker, 1887-1986 [Translator] Project Gutenberg 2023 Not confirmed
German drama -- Translations into English; Hebbel, Friedrich, 1813-1863 -- Translations into English Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 78,402
Reading time 341 min
Text sections 40

Three plays by Frederic Hebbel — Reading Notes can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 78,402 words, 5 hr 41 min estimated reading time, and 40 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 13.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “German drama -- Translations into English,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

This edition collects three plays by Friedrich Hebbel, translated by Leslie Holdsworth Allen and Barker Fairley. The excerpts reveal Hebbel's sharp dialogue, psychological tension, and recurring motifs of accusation, shame, and power. The introduction traces his early poverty and Dittmarscher heritage, which shaped his direct, unvarnished style.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

. Yet, strange to say, at this period he produced _Maria Magdalena_--yet not strange to say; for like Lucretius’ gazer at the storm from land, Hebbel could write of the bitter peasant-life with a relief, for the nonce at least, that it was over. Perhaps, too, the death of his little son Mark, whereby his stay in Paris was threatened, gave his thoughts a gloomy caste. At all events it would be hard to find a more unrelieved atmosphere of misery than in this play--not that subtle Ibsenesque clutch of Fate, but a hard realism whose lines are burnt in with acid. Unwilling to follow out the regulation sorrows of peasant-maidens and noble seducers, Hebbel keeps this tragedy of the _bourgeoisie_ entirely in its own atmosphere. This, his express aim, was good in itself, for the gallant noble has too often been made an example of gaudy and melodramatic sin. It is more powerful to show that a pusillanimous clerk’s sordid love-affair involves tragic issues. The more closely to knit this tragedy to its own atmosphere, the ruin of the girl has been set against the problem of paternal authority. The effect of terror is worked less by the self-slain daughter than by the still living father, who has in him a sort of stupid grandeur, one whose ideas the blacksmith traditions of his class had cast in iron. With a son mismanaged and a daughter dead through these metallic good intentions, he cries dazedly, “I understand the world no longer!” It is the terrible “I want the sun!” given in more manful tones, for with all his obtuseness, he has in him the Roman solemnity of a father’s powers and duties.

The drama was published, but refused by the Berliner Hoftheater, and indeed it now looked as if his retrospect were to become forecast. With the _Maria Magdalena_ was published an essay on the then conditions of the drama, a treatise that made him determined enemies. This fruitless toil for the time embittered him, but his money was not yet exhausted and he went to prolong his dreams in Rome, where the acquaintance with several men of high talent did much to deepen him.

In 1845 he was ready to return to Germany; but during his sojourn abroad the slow shadows of his love-crisis had been creeping on him. Two years of uninterrupted thought had brought an expansion of mind incalculable to one who lived in the intellectual. He was now grown up, conscious of power, and alas, Elise was not grown up. Now she called to him, unable to bear the separation longer; and thereby he was placed in the necessity of decision. No palterer with himself, he refused compromise. He was to choose between an absorber of and a compeer in his ideals. There is no need for harrowing psychology. He chose the latter; let those who blame him acknowledge at least his truth to himself. Let this be said--in later years when Elise had lost her second child, he invited her to his house and made her acquainted with his wife, at whose instance the invitation came. “You have not borne children!” she cried when he hesitated, and in those words she revealed the sympathy which made her so great an actress. Between these two women there grew up a warm friendship--a thing impossible if somewhere in all this there was not a noble element. Let us rather accept it in the spirit of _Aglavaine and Selysette_, than with the rigid sneer of Arnold at Shelley for proposing the same thing to Harriet. These were the words which Elise could afterwards write to Hebbel’s wife--“That our relations could take so pure a colour I ascribe to my sojourn there (Vienna). Though so many hours of bitterness were my lot in that unforgettable town, things would never have shaped themselves thus had I not learned to know you and all the facts on the spot itself. Our bond is now one of those of whose like there are few.”

Friedrich Hebbel's dialogue in these plays operates through accusation and deflection, as seen in the excerpt from Herod and Mariamne. When Salome confronts Herod, her speech is layered with insinuation—'the shame of her spoiled widowhood'—while Herod parries with threats: 'You may be trampled piecemeal.' The exchanges are not merely expository; they enact a power struggle where every line carries a tactical charge. Hebbel's characters rarely speak without an ulterior motive, and the language itself becomes a weapon.

The introduction to this volume, written by the translators, emphasizes Hebbel's 'sharp directness of speech' and his 'raw facing of unvarnished things,' qualities that stem from his upbringing in a Dittmarscher mason's family. This biographical note is not incidental; it frames the reader's encounter with a playwright who, as the editors suggest, waged a 'war on faddists and dilettanti.' The plays themselves bear out this combative, unflinching voice.

Diction of Accusation and Deflection

In the excerpt from Herod and Mariamne, Hebbel's diction is precise and often legalistic. Salome uses the language of a courtroom: 'If before witnesses I bring my plaint / It will be guaranteed your surer ear.' Herod responds with a counter-threat, framing his own position as a judge: 'There was a charge preferred.' The characters do not simply express emotions; they lodge claims and counterclaims. This forensic quality extends to Mariamne's curt reply: 'The King bade summon me that I should greet him? / I greet him; and thereby the work is done.' The word 'work' reduces the greeting to a mechanical obligation, stripping it of warmth. Hebbel's characters often speak in such compressed, almost bureaucratic terms, which heightens the tension between their inner turmoil and their controlled exterior.

Voice and the Weight of Silence

Hebbel's characters frequently comment on what is left unsaid. Herod, alone after Salome's accusations, muses: 'Is it not / As though the whole o' the world were spider-clean / And all had nested them within my house?' The simile of spiders and webs suggests an invisible, entangling presence—perhaps the unspoken accusations that hang in the air. Later, he tells Salome, 'Know you what you have ventured? Know you, woman? / I was rejoiced! D'you understand? And now—' The dash marks a break, a thought too dangerous to complete. Such silences are as telling as the spoken lines. The introduction notes Hebbel's 'rigid or hesitant self-examinings,' a trait that appears in his characters' tendency to interrupt themselves or leave sentences unfinished, as if the full truth is too painful to articulate.

Recurring Motifs: Shame, Debt, and the Gaze

Several motifs recur in the excerpt. Shame appears repeatedly: Salome speaks of 'the shame of having credited your death' and 'the greater shame of her spoiled widowhood.' Herod later says, 'I am so heavy in her debt that she / Can owe no debt to me.' The language of debt and obligation pervades the dialogue, turning personal relationships into transactions. Another motif is the gaze: Herod commands a servant to 'bid the Queen be craved / To grant to us her presence,' and later tells Mariamne that her presence alone will make the charge 'lose its breath and die.' The act of seeing and being seen carries moral weight—to appear is to be judged. These motifs are not merely decorative; they structure the characters' interactions and reveal Hebbel's interest in the social and psychological pressures that govern human behavior.

Structure and the Unfolding of Tension

The excerpt from Herod and Mariamne demonstrates Hebbel's skill in building tension through staggered revelations. The scene opens with Salome's insinuations, then Herod's attempts to deflect, then the delayed entrance of Mariamne. Each character's entrance shifts the power dynamic. Hebbel uses asides and stage directions implied in the dialogue to reveal inner conflict: Herod's aside 'Heart, will you bear her anger' contrasts with his outward bluster. The structure is not linear but recursive—accusations are made, withdrawn, and remade. The introduction describes Hebbel's early life as a series of 'baffles' and 'dour faces,' and this sense of thwarted progress is mirrored in the play's back-and-forth. Readers should attend to the rhythm of entrances and exits, as Hebbel uses them to control the flow of information and emotion.

These plays reward attention to the precise wording of each accusation and evasion. Hebbel's characters speak in a language of debt, shame, and legalistic precision, yet their silences and broken sentences reveal the emotions they try to suppress. The introduction's biographical sketch—Hebbel's poverty, his Dittmarscher heritage, his 'war on faddists'—offers a useful lens, but the plays themselves are the best evidence of his craft. Read with an ear for the subtext of each line, and for the way Hebbel turns dialogue into a battlefield.

Hebbel’s accusations made me think of my father’s silence after an argument, a memory that surfaced while reading Four Plays of Aeschylus — A Closer Reading. That old, god-heavy justice felt familiar too—both writers capture power’s quiet shame, how it lodges in the throat. I sat with that for a while.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How will you remember this book?

Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

How far have you progressed with this book?

2

Did this book hold your interest?

3

How likely are you to recommend this book?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks