The Lawyers, A Drama in Five Acts — Inside the Classic

(0 User reviews)   32
Iffland, August Wilhelm, 1759-1814, Lüdger, C. (Conrad), 1748-1834? [Translator] Project Gutenberg 2010 Not confirmed
German drama -- Translations into English; Legal drama Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 27,187
Reading time 119 min
Text sections 4

The Lawyers, A Drama in Five Acts — Inside the Classic can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 27,187 words, 1 hr 59 min estimated reading time, and 4 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 12.8 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “German drama -- Translations into English,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

This editorial note examines August Wilhelm Iffland's 1799 play through its authorial choices in diction, dialogue, and description, focusing on the tension between plain speech and legal jargon, the use of stage directions to reveal character, and the structural contrast between domestic and official spaces.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.5/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Reissman were wrong,--why would you, for the sake of strangers, destroy my happiness?

_Clar._ Can poor, injured, unhappy children, in any situation, be _strangers_ to me? And have wards, intrusted to my care, fewer titles to my assistance than my own children? And have not you, in the name of the magistrates, appointed me one of their guardians?

_P. Coun._ That, as they are unfortunate, I might see them in good hands.

_Clar._ Why, they are in good hands. I am come to request you to see the business speedily executed. Of the verdict itself I will make no mention. You will act as an honest man, or else I must despise you, and look for redress elsewhere. Meanwhile, I tell you, the children shall not go to the hospital, because that is impracticable.

_P. Coun._ Father, I Have given my word.

_Clar._ You must recall it.

_P. Coun._ How can I?

_Clar._ Say you did not understand the matter. It is upon my word better than to expose your name to shame or ridicule, and to fill your mind with inquietude.

_P. Coun._ Father, I love you dearly, but pray do not interfere with my business.

_Clar._ Very well; then you act as Privy Counsellor, as you think proper; and I, as trustee of the hospital and guardian of the children, will do the same.

_P. Coun._ Cannot we talk of more agreeable things, and drop that question. I wish you so well, but you reject all I propose.

_Clar._ You make me presents in money, and, I am told, you want to make me mayor of the town. Jack, make me no presents! do good to town and country; and, if you can, come after your business is done. I do not care if it be but once or twice every three months; come to me in my timber-yard. Then we will close the doors, seat ourselves in the little bower, where, when a boy, you used to sit so industriously about your tasks; there we will spend an hour in happy converse, and drink a glass of old wine that you shall send me; then I will thank God for my dear boy, who has continued to be a good son, and, when you leave me again to repair to your desk, I will give you my blessing, and look after you, till you are quite out of sight! Do you see, Jack, I ask no more;--I have no occasion for more; but this I earnestly request of you. Give me your hand, that you will do it. That is the way I wish you to honour and to please me.

_P. Coun._ I shall do more, father. Pray accept it, and--

_Clar._ All your other honours are of little estimation in my sight; these grey hairs, blanched with care and toil, shall never be covered with a long bushy wig; look at these hands, rough with labour; look on your father, as you know his ways; you also know that he is neither to be drawn nor driven out of them; Master Clarenbach, even in the office of Mayor, would not suit your fine apartments and your fine company. What, to remain at home, as motionless as an old statue, scarce permitted to speak to an old friend, lest it should lessen his dignity, or break in on his gravity! What, to remain in such a situation, and see people work and move before his window! Jack, that will not do. Pray, as I never found fault with you for being too high, do not find fault with me for being too low; it is best suited to my age and inclinations.

_P. Coun._ Certainly not; but Mr. Reissman insists on it, as a principal condition.

_Clar._ I hope you know that there is a wide difference betwixt your father and Mr. Reissman. My axe, since I could raise it, has been employed in raising houses for the industrious, and his pen, since he could handle it, in pulling them down again.

_P. Coun._ This is the only service you can render me now father; is it not unkind to refuse me then?

_Clar._ The only service I can render you now? What, if the cares and inquietudes of rank and office should lay you on a sick bed, who would attend you with so much tenderness and affection as your old father? What if your house should take fire, I would be the first to ascend through the flames; but I will not climb into office and rank, I tell you that.

_P. Coun._ You must give way, father.--

The play opens with a telling detail: Master Clarenbach, a carpenter, is absorbed in a design for a building, remarking that after his death people will say he "knew what he was about." This early emphasis on craftsmanship and legacy establishes a world where work and reputation are intertwined. Iffland's dialogue immediately distinguishes social positions through speech patterns: the carpenter's direct, plain language contrasts with the footman Lewis's reluctance to remove his hat and his muttered "Very odd." The author uses these small verbal and gestural cues to map the power dynamics within a household, before any legal conflict emerges.

Diction as Social Marker

Iffland assigns distinct vocabularies to characters based on rank and profession. Master Clarenbach speaks in concrete, workmanlike terms: "design," "substantial building," "master in my own house." His son, Deputy Clarenbach, communicates through a servant with a blank paper—a gesture that speaks to bureaucratic abstraction. The Aulic Counsellor Reissman, by contrast, uses emotionally charged, hyperbolic language: "I cannot bear the affront, it shall not go unavenged. I had rather die a thousand deaths." This inflation of feeling marks him as a man accustomed to wielding power through rhetoric. The iron merchant Grobman's speech is transactional, focused on monopolies and sums. Iffland thus creates a linguistic hierarchy where plainness signals integrity, and elaborate expression hints at moral flexibility.

Stage Directions as Psychological Clues

The stage directions in this translation are unusually expressive. When Master Clarenbach tells Lewis to remove his hat, the direction reads: "(takes off his hat reluctantly)." Later, after the father and son exit together, Reissman "follows them a few steps, sets his arms a-kembow, and looks after them." This posture—arms akimbo—conveys defiance and wounded pride without a word. Iffland uses such physical details to externalize inner states: the carpenter's spectacles, the glass of wine brought by Frederica, the stamp of Reissman's foot. These small actions accumulate into a portrait of characters who reveal themselves through gesture as much as speech. The translator, C. Lüdger, preserves these moments, allowing readers to infer motive from movement.

The Architecture of Conflict: Domestic vs. Official Spaces

The play's settings are carefully chosen to reflect moral and social orders. Act I opens in "a plain Tradesman's Room, with old fashioned Furniture"—a space of honest labor. Later scenes shift to the Aulic Counsellor's rooms, where the furniture is presumably finer but the atmosphere is charged with manipulation. Iffland uses these physical environments to frame the central conflict: the carpenter's world is built on tangible work (his design for a building), while the legal world deals in invisible transactions (monopolies, contracts, influence). When Reissman declares he will "pull down" the Privy Counsellor he himself raised, the architectural metaphor echoes the carpenter's opening lines, creating a structural parallel between building and destroying.

Dialogue as Power Play

Iffland crafts dialogue that reveals character through interruption, repetition, and evasion. In Act I, Master Clarenbach cuts off Lewis's attempts to explain: "No deuce here! and—take off your hat when you stand in my presence, Monsieur Lewis." The abrupt shift from rebuke to command shows a man accustomed to being obeyed. Later, Reissman's dialogue with Grobman is a masterclass in feigned reluctance: "Not a single penny; God forbid I should be guilty of such a sin!"—while simultaneously steering the conversation toward a bribe. The playwright uses these verbal maneuvers to expose hypocrisy without explicit commentary. The translation retains the staccato rhythms of the original German, with short lines and frequent dashes that mimic natural speech and heighten dramatic tension.

Readers attentive to Iffland's authorial choices will find a play that operates through implication rather than declaration. The translator's 1799 preface claims the drama aims to "exhibit Virtue in all her native Charms, and Vice in all her Deformity," but the text itself is more nuanced. Pay close attention to who speaks plainly and who speaks in circles, to the objects on stage (a glass of wine, a design, a blank paper), and to the moments when characters are silent or still. These are the details through which Iffland builds his moral argument.

Reading Iffland's play, I kept noticing how rooms shape what people dare to say—the parlor’s ease versus the study’s stiffness. That quiet tension stayed with me, and somehow it surfaced again in the space between lines of Faust: A Lyric Drama in Five Acts — A Closer Reading. Both feel like houses where every doorway hides a confession, and I found myself lingering at those thresholds long after closing the book.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How will you remember this book?

Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

How did the book work for you overall?

3

Would you recommend this book to another reader?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks