About 94 minutes
Shorter Bible Plays — Edition Insights
Fantasy Juvenile Worlds
21,501 recorded words. 3 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #46419This digital edition of The Ghost Breaker: A Melodramatic Farce in Four Acts — Key Ideas to Explore is described by source-level measurements including 22,169 words, 1 hr 37 min estimated reading time, and 4 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 9.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “American drama -- 20th century,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 94 minutes
Fantasy Juvenile Worlds
21,501 recorded words. 3 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #46419About 105 minutes
Fantasy Juvenile Worlds
24,144 recorded words. 8 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #11283About 88 minutes
Fantasy Juvenile Worlds
20,203 recorded words. 9 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #2913Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-26. Coverage: 90 public books, 90 available source excerpts.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Public-domain source text
The source text is kept in the dedicated reader, separate from this catalogue record and its commentary.
The Ghost Breaker opens with a stage direction that immediately establishes its hybrid tone: a "melodramatic farce." The play's first lines, delivered by the Duke to Robledo, set up a conspiratorial urgency that is undercut by the servants' bustling entrances and the villagers' offstage chants. The authors, Paul Dickey and Charles Goddard, rely on rapid-fire dialogue and exaggerated gestures—such as Pedro's bustling and the villagers' repeated cries of "The Duke!"—to signal that the supernatural plot is as much a vehicle for comedy as for suspense.
The dialogue in The Ghost Breaker oscillates between formal, almost archaic phrasing and colloquial American bluntness. The Duke speaks in clipped commands: "You've got work before you—Robledo." Robledo replies with theatrical readiness: "I'm ready, Excellency." This contrast is heightened when the American characters, Jarvis and Rusty, enter. Jarvis's dry aside—"Rusty, we're discovered!"—introduces a wry, self-aware tone that punctures the Spanish characters' grandiosity. The authors use this linguistic clash to generate comedy, as when Dolores addresses Jarvis as "the only man who dares to enter the castle," and he responds with feigned ignorance. The play's diction thus becomes a tool for character differentiation and tonal modulation.
The stage directions in the excerpts are unusually detailed, often dictating not just movement but emotional inflection. For instance, when the Duke says "Any way you please, Robledo—means are of no consequence in this world," the direction (Taking coin from pocket) precedes his order to toast. This physical action underscores the transactional nature of his authority. Similarly, Robledo's offstage command—"Louder, you beggars, louder, or I'll give you something to yell for!"—is paired with the villagers' increasing volume, creating a comic escalation. The authors use such directions to guide actors toward broad, physical performances, reinforcing the farcical element. The repeated entrances and exits (e.g., Pedro bustling, Villagers bowing) suggest a stage crowded with movement, where every gesture is amplified for effect.
A recurring structural device in the excerpts is the use of repeated phrases and call-and-response patterns. The villagers' chant—"The Duke! The Duke! Long live the Duke!"—builds in volume under Robledo's threat, mimicking a crowd's manipulated enthusiasm. Later, Dolores's exclamation "Her Highness!" is echoed by Pedro and the villagers, creating a ripple effect that emphasizes the princess's entrance. This rhythmic repetition serves both melodrama (heightening anticipation) and farce (the mechanical, almost absurd obedience of the characters). The authors also employ parallel dialogue: the Duke's instruction to Robledo is mirrored by Dolores's announcement to Jarvis, linking the two plotlines through structural symmetry. Such patterns give the play a theatrical, almost musical quality, where words become cues for action.
The castle—the central setting—is never described in the excerpts, yet it looms as a offstage presence. Characters refer to it repeatedly: the Duke warns of the American who "will go into that castle tonight," and Dolores identifies Jarvis as "the only man who dares to enter the castle." This technique keeps the supernatural threat abstract, relying on dialogue to build suspense rather than on elaborate sets. The inn, by contrast, is a bustling, well-lit space with servants, trays, and motorcars—a realm of mundane activity. The contrast between the unseen, haunted castle and the crowded inn creates a spatial tension that drives the plot. The authors exploit this by having characters enter and exit from different doors, emphasizing the castle's proximity and the characters' reluctance to approach it. The setting thus functions as a character in itself, its mystery sustained by what is left unsaid.
Readers approaching The Ghost Breaker should attend to the interplay between its stage directions and dialogue, as these reveal the authors' deliberate balancing of melodrama and farce. The play rewards attention to verbal and physical repetition, which builds comic momentum while advancing the plot. The excerpts suggest that the supernatural elements are less about genuine terror than about creating opportunities for exaggerated reactions and mistaken identities—a hallmark of the farcical tradition.
There’s a particular delight in how The Ghost Breaker lets its exaggerated stage directions carry both the tension and the humor, the way a slammed door can be both threat and punchline. It reminds me of flipping through Mr. Punch's Dramatic Sequels — Reading Companion afterwards, where those same theatrical rhythms seem to echo into something softer, almost nostalgic. I found myself smiling at the overlap.
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.